Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKraft-Todd, Gordon T
dc.contributor.authorRand, David Gertler
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-28T19:58:58Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:04:54Z
dc.date.available2022-06-28T19:58:58Z
dc.date.issued2021
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134412.2
dc.description.abstract© 2020 The Authors How can individual scientists most effectively spread the adoption of open science practices? Engaging in open science practices presents a social dilemma because they are individually costly (given the current incentive schemes in academia) but collectively beneficial (due to production of higher quality and more accessible science). Mechanisms for promoting cooperation in social dilemmas typically rely on normativity—but open science practices are still comparatively rare. Further, individuals may be tempted to dishonestly “virtue signal” due to growing support for open science. We formulate a solution based on the theory of credibility-enhancing displays: advocates who are known to themselves practice the behavior they are advocating for (particularly if they are prestigious) are more effective at convincing others—specifically because their actions provide an honest signal of their belief in the behavior's value. Thus, advocates for open science practices should find ways to engage in those practices visibly and often.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1016/j.obhdp.2020.10.009en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceElsevieren_US
dc.titlePractice what you preach: Credibility-enhancing displays and the growth of open scienceen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalOrganizational Behavior and Human Decision Processesen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2021-03-19T13:29:34Z
dspace.orderedauthorsKraft-Todd, GT; Rand, DGen_US
dspace.date.submission2021-03-19T13:29:35Z
mit.journal.volume164en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version