Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerry, Kalen Paul
dc.contributor.authorNedivi, Elly
dc.date.accessioned2022-08-09T19:28:04Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:09:27Z
dc.date.available2022-08-09T19:28:04Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.issn1097-4199
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/134847.2
dc.description.abstract© 2017 Elsevier Inc. Since Cajal's first drawings of Golgi stained neurons, generations of researchers have been fascinated by the small protrusions, termed spines, studding many neuronal dendrites. Most excitatory synapses in the mammalian CNS are located on dendritic spines, making spines convenient proxies for excitatory synaptic presence. When in vivo imaging revealed that dendritic spines are dynamic structures, their addition and elimination were interpreted as excitatory synapse gain and loss, respectively. Spine imaging has since become a popular assay for excitatory circuit remodeling. In this review, we re-evaluate the validity of using spine dynamics as a straightforward reflection of circuit rewiring. Recent studies tracking both spines and synaptic markers in vivo reveal that 20% of spines lack PSD-95 and are short lived. Although they account for most spine dynamics, their remodeling is unlikely to impact long-term network structure. We discuss distinct roles that spine dynamics can play in circuit remodeling depending on synaptic content. Dendritic spines are often viewed as proxies for glutamatergic synapses, and their addition or elimination as indicative of changes in circuit structure. In this review, Berry and Nedivi examine synaptic heterogeneity in the dendritic spine population and its implications for interpreting spine dynamics.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH Pre-Doctoral Training Grant (T32GM007287)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH grant (EY025437)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNIH grant (EY011894)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/J.NEURON.2017.08.008en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs Licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourcePMCen_US
dc.titleSpine Dynamics: Are They All the Same?en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentPicower Institute for Learning and Memoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biologyen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.relation.journalNeuronen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-10-03T14:51:10Z
dspace.orderedauthorsBerry, KP; Nedivi, Een_US
dspace.date.submission2019-10-03T14:51:13Z
mit.journal.volume96en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version