Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRichter, Katharina N
dc.contributor.authorRevelo, Natalia H
dc.contributor.authorSeitz, Katharina J
dc.contributor.authorHelm, Martin S
dc.contributor.authorSarkar, Deblina
dc.contributor.authorSaleeb, Rebecca S
dc.contributor.authorD'Este, Elisa
dc.contributor.authorEberle, Jessica
dc.contributor.authorWagner, Eva
dc.contributor.authorVogl, Christian
dc.contributor.authorLazaro, Diana F
dc.contributor.authorRichter, Frank
dc.contributor.authorCoy-Vergara, Javier
dc.contributor.authorCoceano, Giovanna
dc.contributor.authorBoyden, Edward
dc.contributor.authorDuncan, Rory R
dc.contributor.authorHell, Stefan W
dc.contributor.authorLauterbach, Marcel A
dc.contributor.authorLehnart, Stephan E
dc.contributor.authorMoser, Tobias
dc.contributor.authorOuteiro, Tiago F
dc.contributor.authorRehling, Peter
dc.contributor.authorSchwappach, Blanche
dc.contributor.authorTesta, Ilaria
dc.contributor.authorZapiec, Bolek
dc.contributor.authorRizzoli, Silvio O
dc.date.accessioned2022-07-06T19:47:40Z
dc.date.available2021-10-27T20:30:32Z
dc.date.available2022-07-06T19:47:40Z
dc.date.issued2018
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/136043.2
dc.description.abstract© 2017 The Authors. Published under the terms of the CC BY 4.0 license Paraformaldehyde (PFA) is the most commonly used fixative for immunostaining of cells, but has been associated with various problems, ranging from loss of antigenicity to changes in morphology during fixation. We show here that the small dialdehyde glyoxal can successfully replace PFA. Despite being less toxic than PFA, and, as most aldehydes, likely usable as a fixative, glyoxal has not yet been systematically tried in modern fluorescence microscopy. Here, we tested and optimized glyoxal fixation and surprisingly found it to be more efficient than PFA-based protocols. Glyoxal acted faster than PFA, cross-linked proteins more effectively, and improved the preservation of cellular morphology. We validated glyoxal fixation in multiple laboratories against different PFA-based protocols and confirmed that it enabled better immunostainings for a majority of the targets. Our data therefore support that glyoxal can be a valuable alternative to PFA for immunostaining.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherEMBOen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.15252/EMBJ.201695709en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution 4.0 International licenseen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceEMBO Pressen_US
dc.titleGlyoxal as an alternative fixative to formaldehyde in immunostaining and super‐resolution microscopyen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Media Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Biological Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMcGovern Institute for Brain Research at MITen_US
dc.relation.journalEMBO Journal, Theen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-07-19T14:01:07Z
dspace.orderedauthorsRichter, KN; Revelo, NH; Seitz, KJ; Helm, MS; Sarkar, D; Saleeb, RS; D'Este, E; Eberle, J; Wagner, E; Vogl, C; Lazaro, DF; Richter, F; Coy-Vergara, J; Coceano, G; Boyden, ES; Duncan, RR; Hell, SW; Lauterbach, MA; Lehnart, SE; Moser, T; Outeiro, TF; Rehling, P; Schwappach, B; Testa, I; Zapiec, B; Rizzoli, SOen_US
dspace.date.submission2019-07-19T14:01:09Z
mit.journal.volume37en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version