On the fine-grained complexity of empirical risk minimization: Kernel methods and neural networks
Author(s)
Indyk, Piotr; Schmidt, Ludwig; Backurs, Arturs
DownloadPublished version (323.6Kb)
Publisher Policy
Publisher Policy
Article is made available in accordance with the publisher's policy and may be subject to US copyright law. Please refer to the publisher's site for terms of use.
Terms of use
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
© 2017 Neural information processing systems foundation. All rights reserved. Empirical risk minimization (ERM) is ubiquitous in machine learning and underlies most supervised learning methods. While there is a large body of work on algorithms for various ERM problems, the exact computational complexity of ERM is still not understood. We address this issue for multiple popular ERM problems including kernel SVMs, kernel ridge regression, and training the final layer of a neural network. In particular, we give conditional hardness results for these problems based on complexity-theoretic assumptions such as the Strong Exponential Time Hypothesis. Under these assumptions, we show that there are no algorithms that solve the aforementioned ERM problems to high accuracy in sub-quadratic time. We also give similar hardness results for computing the gradient of the empirical loss, which is the main computational burden in many non-convex learning tasks.
Date issued
2017-12Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence LaboratoryJournal
NIPS'17: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems
Publisher
Curran Associates Inc.
Citation
Indyk, Piotr, Schmidt, Ludwig and Backurs, Arturs. 2017. "On the fine-grained complexity of empirical risk minimization: Kernel methods and neural networks."
Version: Final published version
ISBN
978-1-5108-6096-4