Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorPlatt, Robert
dc.contributor.authorKaelbling, Leslie P
dc.contributor.authorLozano-Perez, Tomas
dc.contributor.authorTedrake, Russell L
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-20T19:38:37Z
dc.date.available2021-11-08T16:01:36Z
dc.date.available2021-12-20T19:38:37Z
dc.date.issued2012-05
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/137692.2
dc.description.abstractWe consider the partially observable control problem where it is potentially necessary to perform complex information-gathering operations in order to localize state. One approach to solving these problems is to create plans in belief-space, the space of probability distributions over the underlying state of the system. The belief-space plan encodes a strategy for performing a task while gaining information as necessary. Unlike most approaches in the literature which rely upon representing belief state as a Gaussian distribution, we have recently proposed an approach to non-Gaussian belief space planning based on solving a non-linear optimization problem defined in terms of a set of state samples [1]. In this paper, we show that even though our approach makes optimistic assumptions about the content of future observations for planning purposes, all low-cost plans are guaranteed to gain information in a specific way under certain conditions. We show that eventually, the algorithm is guaranteed to localize the true state of the system and to reach a goal region with high probability. Although the computational complexity of the algorithm is dominated by the number of samples used to define the optimization problem, our convergence guarantee holds with as few as two samples. Moreover, we show empirically that it is unnecessary to use large numbers of samples in order to obtain good performance. © 2012 IEEE.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipNSF (Grant 0712012)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipONR (Grant N00014-09-1-1051)en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipAFOSR (Grant AOARD-104135)en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherIEEEen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icra.2012.6225223en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alikeen_US
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceMIT web domainen_US
dc.titleNon-Gaussian belief space planning: Correctness and complexityen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationPlatt, Robert, Kaelbling, Leslie, Lozano-Perez, Tomas and Tedrake, Russ. 2012. "Non-Gaussian belief space planning: Correctness and complexity."en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Scienceen_US
dc.eprint.versionAuthor's final manuscripten_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/ConferencePaperen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/NonPeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2019-06-04T14:02:36Z
dspace.date.submission2019-06-04T14:02:37Z
mit.licenseOPEN_ACCESS_POLICY
mit.metadata.statusPublication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

VersionItemDateSummary

*Selected version