Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorArmando Solar Lezama.
dc.contributor.authorTavares, Zenna.en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2021-12-17T17:04:32Z
dc.date.available2021-12-17T17:04:32Z
dc.date.copyright2020en_US
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/138517
dc.descriptionThesis: Ph. D., Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, February, 2020en_US
dc.descriptionManuscript.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (pages 139-149).en_US
dc.description.abstractHuman reasoning is complex, messy, and approximate, and as a result, has been subject to a millennia-long enterprise to extract principles that are simple, neat, and impeccable. This enterprise is incomplete; there are acts of reasoning that humans perform everyday, often effortlessly, that remain both poorly understood and beyond the capabilities of modern methods of artificial intelligence. Specifically, humans understand the causal structure of the world, and mentally manipulate it to imagine worlds that could have been but were not, and even worlds that could never exist in reality. This thesis investigates computational principles of imaginative reasoning; develops programming languages to express the knowledge upon which imaginative reasoning relies, and upon this foundation introduces practical algorithms of automatic inference. Concretely, we introduce probabilistic programming languages - which encode causal probabilistic models as programs - with two new forms of inference. The first is distributional inference, which means to reason with statistical information rather than observational data. This allows us for instance to address problems of algorithmic fairness, robustness, and perform parameter estimation using data about probabilities, expectations and other distributional properties. The second is causal inference, which allows us in complex simulation models to reason about counterfactual what-if scenarios, as well as causation, i.e., whether some event A is the cause of some other event B. To perform inference, we introduce a number of new algorithms. Unlike traditional methods, these modify the internal structure of the model or reinterpret how it is executed. We introduce parametric inversion, which inverts the causal structure to literally run programs in reverse from observations to causes, and predicate exchange, which relaxes Boolean operators to make inference more tractable. Collectively, these contributions shrink the gap between human and machine reasoning, as well as serve as practical tools for scientific modelling and inference.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Zenna Tavares.en_US
dc.format.extent149 pagesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsMIT theses may be protected by copyright. Please reuse MIT thesis content according to the MIT Libraries Permissions Policy, which is available through the URL provided.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectBrain and Cognitive Sciences.en_US
dc.titleImaginative reasoning in probabilistic programsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh. D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dc.identifier.oclc1280902217en_US
dc.description.collectionPh. D. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciencesen_US
dspace.imported2021-12-17T17:04:32Zen_US
mit.thesis.degreeDoctoralen_US
mit.thesis.departmentBrainen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record