Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPaltsev, Sergey
dc.contributor.advisorCameron, Bruce
dc.contributor.authorKumar, Hemant
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-15T13:13:19Z
dc.date.available2022-06-15T13:13:19Z
dc.date.issued2022-02
dc.date.submitted2022-03-16T20:16:34.183Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/143335
dc.description.abstractClimate change is a systemic risk to the world’s economy. Significant and rapid cuts in carbon emissions are needed to limit global warming. Fuel Cell Electric Vehicles (FCEV) offer an attractive alternative for decarbonizing the transportation sector for both Light Duty and Heavy Duty categories. The cost of hydrogen fuel cell-related technologies are decreasing rapidly and FCEVs may provide an alternative to electric vehicles in decarbonization. This thesis provides a fresh look at economics of FCEVs and competing alternatives for decarbonizing transportation and their long-term trends in the US. Based on the recent data, the total cost of ownership (TCO) models are developed for three types of drive train Internal Combustion Engine Vehicles (ICEV), Battery Electric Vehicles (BEV) and FCEV for both Light Duty Vehicle (LDV) and Heavy Duty Vehicle (HDV) categories. A hydrogen retail cost model is developed to provide a detailed understanding of the cost components. The fleet dynamics of Light Duty vehicles (LDV), including ICEV, BEV and FCEV, are modeled using MIT Economic Projection and Policy Analysis (EPPA) model to understand the characteristics of long-term trajectories for the LDV fleet growth in the US. The TCO for BEV and FCEV are higher than ICEV in the LDV sector in the absence of carbon abatement credits or other government support. This implies that FCEVs are about 10% more expensive than BEVs on a cost-per-mile basis. However, there are cost reduction pathways that might make FCEVs competitive in the next 10 years and in the scenarios of accelerated actions. The percentage of FCEVs in total vehicle stock in the US might grow to more than 14% by 2050. The growth is contingent upon the TCO reduction pathways. The TCO of BEV and FCEV Class 8 type trucks are 24% and 40% higher than ICEV trucks, respectively. The fuel cost for FCEV is 2.4 times of BEV’s fuel cost and the retail price of FCEV Class 8 type truck is 1.5 times that of BEV truck. A 40% reduction in hydrogen retail price or a 70% reduction in FCEV truck retail price would make FCEV trucks cheaper than BEV trucks. In all scenarios, substantial government support is needed in the forms of R&D, infrastructure development and financial incentives to realize the potential of hydrogen based transportation.
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.rightsIn Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
dc.rightsCopyright retained by author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
dc.titleHydrogen Powered Cars and Trucks: Is there a role for them in the electrified U.S. future?
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeS.M.
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.
dc.identifier.orcidhttps://orcid.org/ 0000-0002-6494-3353
mit.thesis.degreeMaster
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science in Engineering and Management


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record