MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

An experimental multi-model approach to instrument the sensemaking process at the team-level

Author(s)
Vazquez Rodarte, Ignacio Salvador
Thumbnail
DownloadThesis PDF (11.12Mb)
Advisor
Moser, Bryan
Terms of use
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted Copyright retained by author(s) https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
Just like Julius Caesar’s Gaul, any engineering challenge can be divided into three parts; (1) the problem, (2) solution and (3) design spaces. The interaction between solution and design, and the degree of influence that any given team has upon them will depend on the capacity of said team to make sense of the problem. This thesis presents a framework to evaluate the process of team-level sensemaking. How a small group of individuals show emotion, converse with each other and interact with the engineering problem at hand. This integrated view is tested with a small-n experiment to demonstrate the possible insights and data that can be generated and analyzed. As a contribution to collective intelligence and teamwork, the ability to objectively judge a team’s performance —via Pareto Ranks, measure the conversation dynamics —using graph theory and voice recognition, assessing the average emotion content displayed by the team members —using facial recognition, and estimating team entanglement —with physiological signals captured by smartwatches, gives a deep dive into each team’s sensemaking process. Pending reproduction of the experiment, this first iteration seems to indicate that emotions play a role in a team’s motivation to perform, as does the timing of the conversations the team has. Also, there are heuristics that emerged from the teams when they had to judge which of their proposed in-game designs was better —even though none of them actually met the requirements. The work presented in this thesis is the enactment of one specific sensemaking framework: Weick’s seven properties. Applied to a bounded system, where the problem under analysis is fully understood and the teams operate in game-bubble, where they all have access to the same —yet purposefully limited— information. And just like the participants in this experiment, this thesis might not have crossed the finish line set by the goals, but it certainly moved closer to it.
Date issued
2022-09
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/147232
Department
System Design and Management Program.
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Collections
  • Graduate Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.