Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorVerner, Emil
dc.contributor.authorUsenko, Yevhenii
dc.date.accessioned2023-07-31T19:48:46Z
dc.date.available2023-07-31T19:48:46Z
dc.date.issued2023-06
dc.date.submitted2023-06-27T15:24:29.464Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/151562
dc.description.abstractU.S. corporate taxation is not neutral to inflation. Two of its features – historical cost depreciation and FIFO inventory accounting – are expected to lower real after-tax corporate cash flows and, thereby, make investment less attractive when expected inflation is elevated. Using Compustat data for 1965-1980 and a difference-in-differences research design, I do not find evidence in support of this hypothesis. I discuss possible explanations for this non-result. In addition, I find a robust effect of statutory tax changes on corporate investment during the Great Inflation. The effect is economically meaningful and consistent with the prior literature: a tax reform that increases firm's cost of capital by 10% lowers investment of affected firms by 2 percentage points of total assets relative to firms not affected by the reform.
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technology
dc.rightsIn Copyright - Educational Use Permitted
dc.rightsCopyright retained by author(s)
dc.rights.urihttps://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
dc.titleInflation, Taxation and Corporate Investment in the U.S. During the Great Inflation
dc.typeThesis
dc.description.degreeS.M.
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
mit.thesis.degreeMaster
thesis.degree.nameMaster of Science in Management Research


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record