MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Integrated Energy Modeling Tool for Electric and Gas Infrastructure Decision Support

Author(s)
Galindez de Jesus, Francisco J.
Thumbnail
DownloadThesis PDF (2.253Mb)
Advisor
Knittel, Christopher
Deng, Sili
Terms of use
In Copyright - Educational Use Permitted Copyright retained by author(s) https://rightsstatements.org/page/InC-EDU/1.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
This dissertation compares the total yearly cost to customers of a gas utility company fully electrifying heat with a focus on infrastructure costs versus utilizing hydrogen blending, taking into account the current cost of green hydrogen. Previous research has separately discussed implications and costs of both hydrogen blending and electrification. The former leading to increased safety risks at high blend rates, and minimal or low additional risk at low blend rates. The latter showing strong decarbonization capabilities, but not comparing the two directly in a case study format. The infrastructure costs associated with fully electrifying heat are substantial, including the installation of heat pumps and the associated electrical infrastructure. In contrast, the infrastructure costs associated with hydrogen blending are relatively low. We use 2022 company and customer data to model the cost to upgrade infrastructure to support the additional imposed electric load due to electrification of heating. This cost is aggregated to the energy cost for this new method of heating, taking into consideration energy transformation losses. While not a factor to cost, risks imposed by hydrogen blending are analyzed as a "go no-go" criteria. The paper also looks at the thermodynamic compatibility of hydrogen blends with existent natural gas systems and piping. Our analysis suggests that hydrogen blending is likely to result in a lower cost-to customer for utilities looking to decarbonize their heating systems. While the current cost of green hydrogen is high, it is expected to decrease with further adoption of hydrogen. Moreover, the gradual transition facilitated by hydrogen blending can minimize the overall cost impact on customers. We find that risk imposed by hydrogen blending can be mitigated at the target blending rate of 20%, however margins to risks such as fires, explosions, and pipeline brittle fracture are reduced. In conclusion, the decision between fully electrifying heat and utilizing hydrogen blending as a means of decarbonizing heat requires careful consideration of the associated costs, risks, andhow it helps to achieve company strategy. Our findings have important implications for company executives, who can use this information to determine how the customerwill be affected by major strategy decisons, just one aspect to be considered out of many before making the final decision for a given city or region.
Date issued
2023-06
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/151687
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering; Sloan School of Management
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Collections
  • Graduate Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.