How to Go Greene: The Complex Dynamics of the Ongoing Transition in Southwestern Pennsylvania

Abstract

Coal mining is a huge part of the culture and identity in Greene County. Unprompted, when asked about their personal histories and backgrounds, people will mention family and ancestors who were coal miners, as a way of demonstrating their deep ties to the region. Now, the tax structure is such that a lot of public infrastructures are suffering from the loss in value of coal assets.

Those former heights of prosperity are diminishing. The oil and gas industry has not stepped up to replace the loss in tax revenue intake, nor the loss in jobs, nor has the industry provided funds for remediation of the lands it has damaged.

The residents of Greene County are trying to forge a way to bring the community to a place where everyone who considers it home can stay, and build their home for their kids. From economic diversification, to environmental effects of the fossil industry, to workforce issues, to tax base considerations, to long-term education and planning and housing, every issue is at its core about what it means for Greene County to feel like home.

Not everyone agrees on how to move forward. Some believe in a model where a large investment sparks other service industries to move in and build out the economic base. Others believe in a more grassroots, endogenous model, where residents build their own way out. I hear tensions between those who believe in the benefits fracking has brought to some residents through royalties, and those concerned about lack of fresh food and clean water.

Listening to and uplifting the stories of the community members is one way well-resourced institutions can begin to meaningfully engage with and contribute to local partners, through building trust and relationships. Looking to the future, I hope MIT and others can play supportive, collaborative roles, helping to build capacity and to empower communities to chart their own development.