Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorJaffar, Hassaan
dc.contributor.authorMeleney, Melania
dc.date.accessioned2023-09-08T18:42:47Z
dc.date.available2023-09-08T18:42:47Z
dc.date.issued2023-09-08
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/152067
dc.description.abstractOur sponsor company is a leading player in the healthcare market. Its procurement organization is split into three divisions: corporate, business unit, and global services. The procurement strategy is set by corporate procurement, and then business unit and global services perform the procurement execution, and measure their procurement through metrics in experience, efficiency, and effectiveness. Our main question was whether the policies set by corporate procurement, such as supplier segmentation, are beneficial to those metrics in procurement execution, and whether the procurement process could be re-engineered to improve those metrics. We conducted an analysis of transaction data, created a Value Stream Map, and utilized process mining technology to assess the current process. We then used the principles of process re-engineering to redesign the end-to-end process. We concluded that the policies set by corporate procurement were not beneficial to procurement execution metrics, as the most effort was being placed on the least important segment of suppliers. We created a re- engineered process, which promotes technology such as machine learning, which could lead to improved procurement process metrics.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectSupply Chain Managementen_US
dc.subjectProcurementen_US
dc.titleReimagining Procurement: Differentiated vs Standardized Servicesen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record