MIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Graduate Theses
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Perspectives on Power: Characterizing Public Perceptions Towards Large-Scale Renewable Energy Development in the United States

Author(s)
Chaudhuri, Anushree
Thumbnail
DownloadThesis PDF (7.632Mb)
Advisor
Susskind, Lawrence
Terms of use
Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International (CC BY-NC-ND 4.0) Copyright retained by author(s) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
With rapid growth in renewable energy development expected in the coming decades, it is crucial to ensure the clean energy transition does not perpetuate past injustices in infrastructure siting. In this thesis, I first contextualize historical renewable energy siting policies and patterns in the U.S., as well as current siting policies and debates. Then, I use a mixed-methods approach to characterize community sentiment towards large-scale renewable energy projects. First, I create a database of online narratives surrounding local renewable energy siting disputes using a large language model (LLM). This method analyzes online media, e.g., newspaper articles, public and legal proceedings, and social media, to quantify types of opposition sentiment. My analysis reveals that both wind and higher capacity projects are correlated with greater quantified measures of opposition, as scored by an LLM. To contextualize these national-level quantitative findings, I also conduct case studies of two ongoing siting disputes in California. I use interviews, focus groups, and participatory methods to better understand local context and analyze how recent state preemption of local siting authority affects public perceptions. Stakeholders focus on place-based factors overlooked in national analysis and express a desire for neutral joint fact-finding processes. Finally, I evaluate a university-based clinical model piloted at MIT for proactive stakeholder assessment and joint problem-solving to improve energy justice outcomes in renewable energy siting. Preliminary findings show the clinical approach increases participation of previously underrepresented groups, builds trust between stakeholders compared to a typical siting process, and expands experiential learning opportunities. Ultimately, this thesis suggests that a combination of large-scale empirical research paired with a site-specific clinical approach could enable a more equitable and efficient energy transition.
Date issued
2024-05
URI
https://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/156151
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

Collections
  • Graduate Theses

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibilityContact us
MIT
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.