Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBerglund-Brown, Juliana
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Akrisht
dc.contributor.authorDuarte, Fabio
dc.contributor.authorGanitsky, Raquel
dc.contributor.authorKirchain, Randy
dc.contributor.authorZheng, Siqi
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-31T20:08:49Z
dc.date.available2025-01-31T20:08:49Z
dc.identifier.urihttps://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/158151
dc.description.abstractAdopting Circular Economy practices in the construction industry can help reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, many barriers exist to adoption, and current perceptions of and willingness to pay for circularity have yet to be quantified. This study seeks to understand the various perceptions of circularity in the construction industry, characterize uncertainties and risks, and identify economic incentives and opportunities that could accelerate circular adoption via an industry survey of three stakeholder groups. 58 stakeholders filled out part of the survey, and 42 stakeholders completed the majority of questions. Real estate developers are willing to pay an average premium of 10% for construction costs if there’s a minimum embodied carbon reduction of 53%. Design and construction professionals and material suppliers were also surveyed. Reasons for adopting circular practices were primarily driven by client, design team, and net zero goals. The results of this survey begin to characterize the economic landscape of what is needed for a circular transition in the built environment.en_US
dc.language.isoen
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.relation.isversionof10.1038/s42949-024-00182-9en_US
dc.rightsCreative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivativesen_US
dc.rights.urihttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_US
dc.sourceSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_US
dc.titleStakeholders’ perceptions of and willingness to pay for circular economy in the construction sectoren_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.citationBerglund-Brown, J., Pandey, A., Duarte, F. et al. Stakeholders’ perceptions of and willingness to pay for circular economy in the construction sector. npj Urban Sustain 4, 46 (2024).en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. School of Architecture and Planningen_US
dc.contributor.departmentSenseable City Laboratoryen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planningen_US
dc.relation.journalnpj Urban Sustainabilityen_US
dc.eprint.versionFinal published versionen_US
dc.type.urihttp://purl.org/eprint/type/JournalArticleen_US
eprint.statushttp://purl.org/eprint/status/PeerRevieweden_US
dc.date.updated2025-01-31T20:00:17Z
dspace.orderedauthorsBerglund-Brown, J; Pandey, A; Duarte, F; Ganitsky, R; Kirchain, R; Zheng, Sen_US
dspace.date.submission2025-01-31T20:00:18Z
mit.journal.volume4en_US
mit.journal.issue1en_US
mit.licensePUBLISHER_CC
mit.metadata.statusAuthority Work and Publication Information Neededen_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record