Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorE. Eric Adams.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWannamaker, Eric J. (Eric Joseph), 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-05-19T14:42:11Z
dc.date.available2005-05-19T14:42:11Z
dc.date.copyright2002en_US
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/16814
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2002.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 93-97).en_US
dc.descriptionThis electronic version was submitted by the student author. The certified thesis is available in the Institute Archives and Special Collections.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis work investigates the environmental impacts of releasing solid CO₂ hydrate particles into the deep ocean for the purpose of CO₂ sequestration. Release of CO₂ in this form may be desirable as hydrate particles are negatively buoyant in seawater, and dissolution of CO₂ enhances this negative buoyancy via the solute density effect. Hence, the total plume thickness of a negatively buoyant CO₂ hydrate plume may exceed that of positively buoyant CO₂ release. This is seen as a potential advantage both in terms of dilution and sequestration depth. A brief description of the two-phase integral plume model used for stagnant plume modeling is given as well as some background in multi-phase plume physics. Physical and chemical properties relevant to CO₂ hydrates and the ocean environment are discussed, as well as a description of the applicable carbonate chemistry. The integral model used for plume modeling is calibrated based on available data, as is the mass transfer model. The impact of mean particle size particle size distribution, and mass injection rate on relevant integrated parameters is explored via numerical modeling. A brief comparison of the plume group effect for positive and negative buoyancy is presented as well. Three different CO₂ release scenarios, including a hydrate particle plume, a towed pipe release, and a manifold based liquid CO₂ release are compared in terms of their pH impact to the water column.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Eric J. Wannamaker.en_US
dc.format.extent97 p.en_US
dc.format.extent767216 bytes
dc.format.extent766935 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleModeling carbon dioxide particle releases in the deep oceanen_US
dc.title.alternativeModeling CO₂ particle releases in the deep oceanen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc50617268en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record