Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid W. Miller.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLamamy, Julien-Alexandre, 1978-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-06-02T18:36:29Z
dc.date.available2005-06-02T18:36:29Z
dc.date.copyright2004en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/17776
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 225-230).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe future of Mars exploration is challenging from multiple points of view. To enhance their science return, future surface probes will most likely be equipped with complex Sample Preparation And Transfer (SPAT) facilities. Future rovers will need to be able to perform longer traverses and delicate sample acquisition operations. Mars return missions would benefit from a new propulsion system, with better fuel and travel time efficiencies than chemical and electric propulsions, respectively. A model was developed that optimizes SPAT facilities in terms of productivity and system mass. The SPAT model especially investigates two trade-offs: shared versus specific preparation, and warm versus cold redundancy for SPAT elements. A Mars Surface Exploration (MSE) framework was created to help designers perform preliminary studies on rover missions. MSE applies multidisciplinary design optimization techniques for the analysis of design trade-offs relevant to the rover design community. The Propellant Production In Mars Orbit (PPIMO) is presented as a promising solution for performing return travels to Mars. PPIMO uses the concept of regenerative aerobraking to produce fuel in-situ. The SPAT model shows that warm redundancy improves productivity by both reducing risk and removing sample throughput bottlenecks. A method is presented for determining the economy of scale the shared preparation architecture must exhibit for it to be competitive in comparison to the distributed architecture. MSE is used to budget the future development costs of rover autonomy, in addition to assessing: the benefits of oversized suspensions, the practicality of solar versus nuclear power for future missions, and the advantages of multi-rover missions. When compareden_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) to chemical and electric propulsions, PPIMO propulsion shows a better performance in terms of transportation ratio for payloads larger than 1000 kilograms.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Julien-Alexandre Lamamy.en_US
dc.format.extent230 p.en_US
dc.format.extent11246324 bytes
dc.format.extent11266365 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleEnhancing the science return of Mars missions via sample preparation, robotic surface exploration and in orbit fuel productionen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc56543960en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record