Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid Caplan.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChen, Evan, 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-06-02T19:50:09Z
dc.date.available2005-06-02T19:50:09Z
dc.date.copyright2003en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/18065
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, February 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 167-175).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis explores two important factors that constrain the syntactic parser of the sentence processing mechanism, syntactic storage costs and plausibility information. It uses behavioral methods to explore the characteristics of the two factors and neuroimaging to explore the underlying neurological substrates associated with these aspects of syntactic processing. Experiment 1 behaviorally demonstrated the presence of syntactic storage costs for predictions of verbs, filler-gaps, and subcategorized prepositional phrases. It is argued that the data support the Dependency Locality Theory (Gibson, 2000) supposition of stored predicted heads as well as a theory of syntax that includes empty categories. Experiment 2 demonstrated brain regions associated with storage and integration cost demands in the contrast of subject-object (SO) and object-subject (OS) sentence structures. The results indicate that the inferior parietal cortex is part of a larger network of cortex, including inferior frontal perisylvian areas, that is involved in the processing of SO vs. OS sentences. However, the involvement is not identical to that of the inferior frontal areas and has a distinct hemodynamic character. Experiment 3 explored regions of the brain involved in the resolution of the main verb/reduced relative (MV/RR) ambiguity. Activation was seen in portions of the angular gyrus and the middle temporal gyrus for a contrast in subject noun plausibility, but not structure ambiguity, indicating that the MV interpretation was still considered even in unambiguously relative clause sentence structures. The unexpected results could imply that syntax is not the only factor that determines [theta]-role assignment and ultimately provide evidence about the brain regions involved inen_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) the process of plausibility information resolution in sentence interpretation.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Evan Chen.en_US
dc.format.extent210, [6] p.en_US
dc.format.extent10688450 bytes
dc.format.extent10716402 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.titleCharacteristics of syntactic processing : an examination utilizing behavioral and fMRI techniquesen_US
dc.title.alternativeCharacteristics of syntactic processing : an examination utilizing behavioral and functional magnetic resonance imaging techniquesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.identifier.oclc57517737en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record