Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorRepenning, Nelson
dc.contributor.authorSterman, John
dc.date.accessioned2003-02-03T19:31:31Z
dc.date.available2003-02-03T19:31:31Z
dc.date.issued2003-02-03T19:31:31Z
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/1815
dc.description.abstractTo better understand the factors that support or inhibit internally-focused change, we report the results of an inductive study of one firm's attempt to improve two of its core business processes. Our data suggest that the critical determinants of success in efforts to learn and improve are the interactions between managers' attributions regarding the cause of poor organizational performance and the physical structure of the workplace, particularly delays between investing in improvement and recognizing the rewards. Building on this observation, we propose a dynamic model capturing the mutual evolution of those attributions, managers' and workers' actions, and the production technology. We use the model to show how managers' beliefs about those that work for them, workers' beliefs about those who manage them, and the physical structure of the environment can coevolve to yield an organization characterized by conflict, mistrust, and control structures that prevent useful change of any typen
dc.format.extent125869 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.relation.ispartofseriesMIT Sloan School of Management Working Paper;4372-02
dc.titleCapability Traps and Self-Confirming Attribution Errors in the Dynamics of Process Improvmenten
dc.typeWorking Paperen


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record