Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorCarl D. Martland.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLowtan, Donavan M. (Donavan Mahees), 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-26T19:38:21Z
dc.date.available2005-09-26T19:38:21Z
dc.date.copyright2004en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28297
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 203-210).en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Many Class I railroads disappeared and severe competition bankrupted many small carriers in the trucking industry. Larger trucking carriers gained market dominance. Real wages in the trucking industry fell. The size of the railroad labour force decreased while railroad wages remained stagnant. Based on numerous pre-deregulation indicators provided by the government, industry, and academia, this essay shows that deregulation did not fulfill many of the promises made prior to the Staggers Act and the Motor Carrier Reform Act.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe Interstate Commerce Commission successfully implemented its 1887 mandate of reducing the monopolistic powers of the railroads. However, as freight transportation evolved into a competitive system with the emergence of trucking, the ICC effectively adapted its policies. ICC minimum rate regulations and track abandonment procedures kept many Class I railroads competitive. ICC ownership certificate requirements reduced destructive competition in the trucking industry. The blame assigned to the ICC for railroad problems was exaggerated. The Penn Central bankruptcy showed that the railroads had a variety of non-regulation related problems; including rigid management, poor attitudes towards passenger rail services, and inadequate merger planning. This exaggeration was part of a wider misrepresentation as indicated by the attempt to portray Northeast railroad problems as a system-wide problem. This essay shows that there were in fact, many profitable railroads prior to deregulation. Before the passage of the Staggers Act and Motor Carrier Reform Act in 1980, the ICC witnessed the survival of the railroads and truckers through significant economic and political changes, including increased competition, evolving industrial markets, high interest rates, inflation, urbanization, and two World Wars. This was all done while allowing the overall transportation network to evolve into a ubiquitous, competitive system. Deregulation did not achieve several of its stated goals. Freight rail profits were flat and trucking profits fell. The railroads remained unfavourably viewed by Wall Street investors as annual capital investment shortfalls mounted.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Donavan M. Lowtan.en_US
dc.format.extent210 p.en_US
dc.format.extent11476173 bytes
dc.format.extent11503455 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAssessing the impact of regulation and deregulation on the rail and trucking industriesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc55589618en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record