Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid Pesetsky.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNorris, Rebecca L. (Rebecca Lynn), 1977-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2009-01-30T18:38:16Z
dc.date.available2009-01-30T18:38:16Z
dc.date.copyright2003en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/28344en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/28344
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Linguistics and Philosophy, February 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaf 48).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn order to discover how children acquire the T(ense) and C(omplementizer) system, finite and nonfinite embedded clauses produced by children in the CHILDES database were studied. It was discovered that young children often delete to in nonfinite embedded clauses, and that they use that in the C position of finite imbedded clauses far less often than adults do. By adapting Wexler's (1998) theory of optional infinitives to a Pesetsky and Torrego (2001, 2002) framework, I show that the facts about both finite and nonfinite embedded clauses are due to three conflicting constraints: a modified Unique Checking Constraint based on that in Wexler (1998), a conceptual constraint requiring both T and C to appear in every full clause, and a constraint which tells children to use phonological closeness to decide which goal to move when two goals are equally close to a probe. Children cannot avoid violation of at least one constraint, so they are required to violate as few as possible. This results in different possible derivations, each one of which produces results which are seen in child speech.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Rebecca L. Norris.en_US
dc.format.extent48 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/28344en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectLinguistics and Philosophy.en_US
dc.titleAcquisition of the T and C system in clausal complementsen_US
dc.title.alternativeAcquisition of the tense and complementizer system in clausal complementsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Linguistics and Philosophy
dc.identifier.oclc55704246en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record