Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDaniel Whitney.en_US
dc.contributor.authorMascoli, Gregory Jen_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2005-09-27T20:56:33Z
dc.date.available2005-09-27T20:56:33Z
dc.date.copyright1999en_US
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29154
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design & Management Program; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 1999.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 91-92).en_US
dc.description.abstractEngineering and Manufacturing firms face increasing pressure to continuously improve product development performance in terns of time to market, development cost, and customer satisfaction. The product development organization continues to evolve, first from a strictly functional focus to a product centric focus, and currently to some middle ground between the two extremes, where the strengths of the functional organization are recognized along with the merits of product focused teams. Almost simultaneously, many firms are becoming more distributed geographically and culturally, driven by internal and external influences including: efficiencies of co-location and outsourcing, business partnerships, joint ventures, and offset agreements. As the product development organization becomes less centralized, the challenge of integrating components into the top level system becomes much more complex relative to the time when all the components were designed and built in a relatively central location. One approach to address the increasingly critical integration issues is to develop and execute a process that encourages a system level approach to product development, a process that complements the part- and assembly-level design process. This thesis outlines the definition and implementation of a systems engineering process for jet engine development and delivery at a large aerospace company. We assess how well systems engineering manages component integration issues and determine whether it sufficiently mitigates the inherent risks associated with product development in a highly distributed engineering and manufacturing environment. The Design Structure Matrix is used to critique the tasks identified in this process as well as the plan for integrating them. We then make specific recommendations regarding: a) process enhancements; and b) roles and responsibilities of the Systems Engineering Organization to help ensure the overall success of the enterprise.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Gregory J. Mascoli.en_US
dc.format.extent139 p.en_US
dc.format.extent11604633 bytes
dc.format.extent11604393 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleA systems engineering approach to aero engine development in a highly distributed engineering and manufacturing environmenten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc45279359en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record