MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logoDSpace@MIT

MIT
View Item 
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Theses - Dept. of Economics
  • Economics - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
  • View Item
  • DSpace@MIT Home
  • MIT Libraries
  • MIT Theses
  • Theses - Dept. of Economics
  • Economics - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
  • View Item
JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

Essays on taxation and mutual funds

Author(s)
Plancich, Stephanie L. (Stephanie Lynn), 1973-
Thumbnail
DownloadFull printable version (6.463Mb)
Other Contributors
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.
Advisor
James Poterba and Sendhil Mullainathan.
Terms of use
M.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission. http://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
Metadata
Show full item record
Abstract
The first chapter of this dissertation examines the behavior of long- and short-term capital gains distributions after the passage of the Tax Reform Act of 1997, which lowered the maximum tax rate on long-term gains. Using a panel of mutual fund data, I examine the ratio of long-term to total gains distributions around the time of the Act, and find that fund managers appear to tilttheir distributions towards the long-term after 1997. This behavior is consistent with the hypothesis that managers are tax-sensitive, and the estimates are robust to the inclusion of fund-level fixed effects and other controls. I also examine fund capital gains patterns in a difference-in-differences framework, comparing actively managed to index funds; this technique gives a lower-bound estimate of the increase in the fraction of gains paid-out as long-term after the Act of five percentage points. The second chapter examines equity mutual fund dividend yields. Dividends are highly-taxed for individual investors, but tax-favored for corporate investors. Consequently, I hypothesize that corporate investors may prefer to hold higher-dividend yield funds than non-corporate investors. I use institutional funds as a proxy for corporate, trust, or non-profit shareholders, and find that these funds do have systematically higher dividend yields than their retail counterparts. These results are consistent with the tax clientele hypothesis, and are robust to the inclusion of a number of fund- and industry-level controls.
 
(cont.) Chapter three, co-authored with James Poterba, documents the increasing use of redemption fees throughout the mutual fund industry. These fees are levied against investors who liquidate their positions before a specified time, and are paid back into the fund to compensate existing investors for the negative externalities of redemptions. We find that foreign and sector funds are more likely to impose redemption fees, and that institutional funds are less likely to have fees. Using data from the SEC, we find that the largest funds with redemption fees collected nearly $58 million in fees in 2000. We also find that funds with redemption fees appear to have lower turnover and higher returns than their no-fee counterparts, controlling for time, fund objective, and other characteristics.
 
Description
Thesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2002.
 
Includes bibliographical references.
 
Date issued
2002
URI
http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29265
Department
Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.
Publisher
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keywords
Economics.

Collections
  • Economics - Ph.D. / Sc.D.
  • Economics - Ph.D. / Sc.D.

Browse

All of DSpaceCommunities & CollectionsBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionBy Issue DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

My Account

Login

Statistics

OA StatisticsStatistics by CountryStatistics by Department
MIT Libraries homeMIT Libraries logo

Find us on

Twitter Facebook Instagram YouTube RSS

MIT Libraries navigation

SearchHours & locationsBorrow & requestResearch supportAbout us
PrivacyPermissionsAccessibility
MIT
Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Content created by the MIT Libraries, CC BY-NC unless otherwise noted. Notify us about copyright concerns.