Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorGeorge E. Apostolakis.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Curtis Lee, 1966-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Nuclear Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-24T18:10:24Z
dc.date.available2006-03-24T18:10:24Z
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/29998
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Nuclear Engineering, 2002.en_US
dc.description"September 2002."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 235-244).en_US
dc.description.abstractDecision making as a part of nuclear power plant operations is a critical, but common, task. Plant management is forced to make decisions that may have safety and economic consequences. Formal decision theory offers the potential for a structured approach capable of taking into account risk-related aspects (plant and worker safety, for instance) and, at the same time, important factors like economics and regulatory requirements. Since power generation involves large capital and operational costs, making the decision process more efficient can lead to significant economical savings. With millions of dollars at stake, it is imperative that operational decisions be made in a logical and consistent fashion. In addition to the monetary concerns, a primary driver for this work is the desire to make defensible decisions. Within a structured organization like a nuclear power plant, a variety of interactions take place between groups of decision makers. These groups are asked to provide guidance on a variety of issues, ranging from complex regulatory requirements to planning maintenance activities of standby equipment. By providing an integrated package for decision making, it is believed that tools like the plant risk assessment can be used in a defensible manner as part of the day-to-day operation of the facility. The goal of this report is to describe a decision methodology for nuclear power plant incidents. Here, incidents are categorized as plant upsets that are not serious challenges to plant safety, but nonetheless require an appropriate response.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) As part of this decision methodology, risk assessment, worker safety, economics, preferences, and formal decision making models make up the foundation. We describe the construction, analysis heuristics, and inherent uncertainty of these models. From this methodological framework, we developed a prototypical on-line advisory tool that provides decisional advice relevant to incident management. The capabilities of this prototype are discussed along with a demonstration via case studies.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Curtis Lee Smith.en_US
dc.format.extent371 p.en_US
dc.format.extent18561501 bytes
dc.format.extent18561304 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectNuclear Engineering.en_US
dc.titleRisk-informed incident management for nuclear power plantsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Engineeringen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Nuclear Science and Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc55001828en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record