Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorChris Magee.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPretorius, Jacob v. R., 1969-en_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-24T18:15:33Z
dc.date.available2006-03-24T18:15:33Z
dc.date.copyright2003en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/30056
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design & Management Program, February 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 69-72).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis is a study into the allocation of resources in the early stages of research in a small commercial entity that develops innovative technologies. The premise is that resource allocation must focus on the implementation of the technology from a broad, end-to-end, systems viewpoint rather than purely on the inventive or scientific research. Only by understanding and addressing issues early in a development process can technology be efficiently developed. This thesis examines in depth the approach to the development of technologies taken by eight small innovative research companies in the New England Area. These companies all received funding through the government's Small Business Innovative Research program. Half of the companies received additional funding from external entities and qualified for Fast Track funding from the Department of Defense. The study was conducted by means of a questionnaire and in person interviews to identify how companies identify, evaluate and allocate resources to challenges. The strategies that were followed, problems encountered, collaborations with other entities and the outcomes of their programs were examined. This process set up a natural experiment between companies that received Fast Track and thus external funding on the basis of augmented external communication. The main conclusions of the research are that the Fast Track program, for the small sample studied here, did not influence the processes followed by the companies. Rather the long-term strategies of the companies dictated how they dealt with adversity. Moreover, in contradiction to previous studies that examined these same companies immediately after the SBIR work was completed, the fast-track companies showed no greater commercializationen_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) success than the comparison companies. The diminished differentiator of the Fast Track program can be attributed to a) the great deal of uncertainty that is inherent with applications research and b) the short time and limited funding of the SBIR program, which in itself limits the probability of success independent of the Fast-Track mechanism.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jacob v.R. Pretorius.en_US
dc.format.extentv, 87 p.en_US
dc.format.extent5780216 bytes
dc.format.extent5780019 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleResource allocation in applications research : challenges and strategies of small technology developing companiesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc55627307en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record