Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEduardo Kausel.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGeorgakopoulos, Phillip J. (Phillip John), 1982-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-02-02T18:49:51Z
dc.date.available2006-02-02T18:49:51Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/31117
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 54-55).en_US
dc.description.abstractIt has become evident recently that abnormal loads need to be considered in the design of structures so that progressive collapse can be prevented. Building collapses such as the Ronan Point, Alfred P. Murrah, and World Trade Center have shown the catastrophic nature of progressive collapse and with an increasing trend towards more terrorist action in the future, it is clear structural design must include progressive collapse mitigation. The most critical abnormal loadings that have potential to cause progressive failure are blast and impact. These loads are impulsive and dynamic in nature with the potential to induce destructive forces, and to further complicate matters is the random nature of occurrence which makes it difficult to predict adequate levels of design. Much research has been conducted over the past several decades, but to this day very little standardized language has been published to help designers create progressive collapse resistant structures. What is known is that robust structures can be built economically by following a general design philosophy of redundancy, ductility, and overall structural integrity. Reinforced concrete structures are especially well suited for resisting progressive collapse by specifying steel reinforcement detailing such as continuous top and bottom reinforcement, close spacing of stirrups, strategic locations of splices, continuous reinforcement through joints, and designing slabs for two-way action. Steel structures have good ductility, but connection detailing is usually the weakest point and requires special design, such as the use of the SidePlate (tm) connection.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Regardless of the type of material used, the design should strive for a uniform, regular layout of the structural system with limited span lengths and close spacing of beams and columns. Perimeter defense systems should be employed as this decreases the threat of an abnormal loading. Since there has been little consideration of extreme loadings, existing structures may be inadequate and require retrofit. Although more difficult, it is possible to achieve improved progressive collapse resistance through the use of externally applied retrofits, such as concrete encasement or the application of composite polymer materials.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Phillip J. Georgakopoulos.en_US
dc.format.extent55 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent4786326 bytes
dc.format.extent4791089 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleAn overview of progressive collapse in structural systemsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Eng.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc61146362en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record