Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMichael Cusumano.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSaghbini, Jean-Claude Jen_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-02-02T18:55:04Z
dc.date.available2006-02-02T18:55:04Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/31170
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 127-130).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn order to cope with the continuous increase of magnetically stored data and of mission critical dependence on this data, storage systems must similarly increase in their functionality offerings, and with that, their complexity. The efficient management of the heterogeneous and complex aggregation of these systems is becoming one of the major challenges to IT customers. At the same time, hardware is becoming commoditized, and the industry is looking towards software for additional revenue generation. This document examines proprietary as well as open-standards attempts at solving the interoperability problem. The first attempt was made by EMC when it developed WideSky, a middleware software layer that would be able to manage third party hardware. It is shown that the aim was to eventually transform this middleware into a de facto standard and with that establish platform leadership in the industry. The WideSky effort failed, and the analysis of this failure attributes it to a lack of industry support and inability at establishing a sustainable value chain. Meanwhile, the industry players rallied around the SNIA body and adopted the SMI specification (SMI-S) as a standard. SMI-S adoption is on the rise, but although it has the formal backing of most of the storage industry firms, it has not yet fulfilled its promise of enabling centralized management of heterogeneous systems. This is partially because of the fact that the functionality that it provides is still lagging behind the functionality that native APIs provide. Moreover, client adoption and the availability of client products that can be directly used by IT customers are still very limited.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) However, an examination of the dynamics surrounding this standard show how SMI-S will benefit greatly from learning effects and network externalities as it continues to grow, and although lagging in traditional functionality, it offers an ancillary functionality of interoperability that is missing from current non- standardized software interfaces. The adoption tipping point is highly dependant on whether or not the value chain can be established before vendors start dropping support for the specification. It is proposed that a positive tipping of the market will make SMI-S a disruptive technology that has the potential of becoming the dominant design for storage management interfaces.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jean-Claude Jacques Saghbini.en_US
dc.format.extent130 p.en_US
dc.format.extent5999226 bytes
dc.format.extent6015955 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleStandards in the data storage industry : emergence, sustainability, and the battle for platform leadershipen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc61233791en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record