Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid L. Darmofal.en_US
dc.contributor.authorLamb, Caroline Marieen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-03-29T18:46:25Z
dc.date.available2006-03-29T18:46:25Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32459
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 79-81).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe relationship between tolerances of statically measured geometric parameters and the aerodynamic performance of a sample of manufactured airfoils is investigated in this thesis. The objective is to determine which geometric parameters are the best discriminators of performance, and how these best discriminators are affected by changes in design methodology, manufacturing precision, and desired minimum performance levels. A probabilistic model of geometric variability for a three-dimensional blade is derived. Using this geometric variability model, probabilistic aerodynamic simulations are conducted to analyze the variability in aerodynamic performance. Tolerance optimization is then applied, in which allowable ranges for each geometric parameter are determined so as to maximize the quality of the accepted blades. Optimization is performed at several performance limits to observe how the effectiveness of tolerances and the best geometric discriminators of performance change with performance limit. A set of compressor blade data is used consisting of an original geometry, a deterministic re-design, and a probabilistic re-design. Using the geometric variability model, the variability is also artificially increased to investigate the impact of manufacturing precision on tolerance effectiveness. Results shows the best geometric indicators of performance are leading-edge thickness and measures pertaining to the curve quality of an airfoil. While design can affect the performance of tolerances, tolerances are no less effective on probabilistic designs than deterministic designs.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Additionally, manufacturing precision affects the best geometric indicators of performance but tolerance effectiveness is not affected.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Caroline Marie Lamb.en_US
dc.format.extent81 p.en_US
dc.format.extent3630163 bytes
dc.format.extent3633741 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleProbabilistic performance-based geometric tolerancing of compressor bladesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.identifier.oclc61751700en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record