Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJohn B. Heywood.en_US
dc.contributor.authorJacobus, Headley Stewarten_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-05-15T20:41:02Z
dc.date.available2006-05-15T20:41:02Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/32945
dc.descriptionThesis (S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaf 44).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the past decade the MIT campus has grown by leaps and bounds. New buildings such as the Zesiger Sports Center, Stata Center, Simmons Hall, and Sidney-Pacific Street Dorm are only some of the buildings erected in the past decade. Such extreme campus growth means that the MIT campus is quickly outstripping its ability to produce steam and electricity. At the moment, MIT's campus peak demand is 31 MW of electricity and 372,282 lbs/hr of steam' yet the MIT cogeneration plant only produces 21 MW of power and 230,000 lbs/hr of firm steam production2. In addition to this desire to satisfy its own energy requirements, MIT must also minimize greenhouse emissions from the campus. In 2004 MIT completed a feasibility study to expand the campus cogeneration plant by installing two new gas turbines and Heat Recovery Steam Generators. I have endeavored to study the feasibility of using fuel cells as a replacement to these gas turbines. Specifically I examined UTC Power's PureCellTM 200, Siemens Westinghouse's SFC 200, and Fuel Cell Energy's DFC 3000. These three fuel cells represent a range of fuel cell technology available for commercial use now or within the next two years.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) All three fuel cells could be viable for distributed cogeneration around campus, but do not seem suitable for use in an expansion housed solely in Building 41. All three fuel cells require large footprints to produce the 11 MW called for in the planned plant expansion. These three fuel cells could be made more attractive for the MIT cogeneration plant by augmenting their thermal production with either direct natural firing in the fuel cell exhaust or coupling the fuel cell with a gas turbine. Fuel cells will increase the electrical efficiency of the gas turbine and, depending on the fuel cell, may also increase the overall efficiency of the gas turbine. Increasing overall efficiency will result in decreased CO2 emissions and decreased fuel costs for MIT.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Headley Stewart Jacobus.en_US
dc.format.extent50 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent4300535 bytes
dc.format.extent4301109 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleA comparison of high temperature fuel cells and gas turbines for expansion of the MIT Cogeneration Planten_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc62785268en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record