Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHenry Church.en_US
dc.contributor.authorRosenthal, Daniel Todden_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-06-19T17:39:05Z
dc.date.available2006-06-19T17:39:05Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33084
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 36-37).en_US
dc.description.abstractFailure to follow-up on abnormal tests is a common clinical concern comprising the quality of care. Although many clinicians track their patient follow-up by scheduling follow-up visits or by leaving physical reminders, most feel that automated, computerized systems to track abnormal test results would be useful. While existing clinical decision support systems and computerized clinical reminders focus on providing assistance with choosing the appropriate follow-up management, they fail by not tracking that follow-up effectively. We believe that clinicians do not want suggestions how to manage their patients, but instead want help tracking follow-up results once they have decided the management plan. We believe that a well-designed system can successfully track this follow-up and only require a small amount of information and time from the clinician. We have designed and implemented a complete tracking system including 1) an authoring tool to define tracking guidelines, 2) a query tool to search electronic medical records and identify patients without follow-up, and 3) a clinical tool to send reminders to clinicians and allow them to easily choose the follow-up management. Our tracking system has made improvements on previous reminder systems by 1) using our unique risk-management guideline model that more closely mirrors, yet does not attempt to replicate, the clinical decision process, 2) our use of massive population-based queries for tracking all patients simultaneously, and 3) our longitudinal approach that documents all steps in the patient follow-up cycle. With these developments, we are able to track 450 million pieces of clinical data for 1.8 million patients daily.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Keyword follow-up tracking; reminder system; preventive medicine; computerized medical record system; practice guidelines; clinical decision support systemen_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Daniel Todd Rosenthal.en_US
dc.format.extent37 p.en_US
dc.format.extent2956224 bytes
dc.format.extent2955565 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.titleA clinician-mediated, longitudinal tracking system for the follow-up of clinical resultsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.identifier.oclc62171955en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record