Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorMark Jarzombek.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPedret, Annieen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-13T15:11:11Z
dc.date.available2006-07-13T15:11:11Z
dc.date.copyright2001en_US
dc.date.issued2001en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33271
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2001.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 247-271).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis study is an intellectual micro-history which examines the debates about the future of modern architecture and planning that occurred within CIAM (Congès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne) between 1945-1959. This investigation traces the emergence of a new set of values for modern architecture as they were expressed by a group of its younger members that became known, in 1954, as Team 10. Set within the context of CIAM before World War II, the intellectual context during the war, and the radically new social and political context of Europe after the war, this inquiry pays particular attention to the period between 1954-1956, an intense period for the young Dutch and English CIAM members in developing the theoretical position that would lead to the dissolution of CIAM as an institution, form the basis of their work in Team 10's better-known period of the 1960s and 1970s, and change the terms of debate for architectural practice ever since. This inquiry contributes to the neglected area of architecture inquiry that examines theories of production. It is founded on the premise that all design production is based on a theory, implicitly held or explicitly stated, and these theories are not necessarily consistent with architectural production. From this methodological position I argue that the importance of Team 10 lies less in their role as insurgents who dismantled the institution of CIAM, than as contributors, for the discipline of architecture, to a cultural critique of Modernism occurring in postwar society in general.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) This study contributes to on going studies on the development of modernist practices by proposing a critical role for Team 10 in the shift from formal Modernism to critical Postmodernism, and provides a case study for how important intellectual shifts occur.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Annie Pedret.en_US
dc.format.extent374 p.en_US
dc.format.extent26351268 bytes
dc.format.extent26367847 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titleCIAM and the emergence of Team 10 thinking, 1945-1959en_US
dc.title.alternativeCongès Internationaux d'Architecture Moderne and the emergence of Team 10 thinking, 1945-1959en_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc50556489en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record