Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRoberto Rigobon.en_US
dc.contributor.authorGoune, Steven Een_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-31T15:11:38Z
dc.date.available2006-07-31T15:11:38Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33548
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 52-53).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe world-wide consolidation in the electronic trading industry has provided evidence that small exchanges and trading portals need to deliver more than sophisticated technology, streaming quotes and market data. In order to deliver value and survive, they need to provide liquidity. Noteworthy among the most recent industry challenges is the dismal performance of exchanges like the Belgian Stock Exchange that finally caved in to the inevitable merger with the London Stock Exchange. The Italian exchange took similar action and so did a number of other small exchanges in the European Union. This development has exacerbated the debate over the need for small stock exchanges and portals to exist unless they can provide both superior technology and liquidity. This paper proposes to examine the performance of the Belgian stock exchange and a select group of portals trading Belgian equities through the metric of liquidity access for fostering trade execution and capital flows. Illiquidity and the dislocation of a number of securities traded on the Belgian exchange are examined using transaction costs and the price impact of trading (as opposed to just asset prices) to explain such lack of liquidity.en_US
dc.description.abstractConcurrently, the intervention of aggregators of liquidity pools and the rising influence of noise traders (hedge funds) are analyzed to provide a framework for understanding the mechanisms used to attract liquidity. This serves to determine whether portals may continue to attract large pools of liquidity. In closing, we suggest that capital assets are probably not mispriced in markets served by small exchanges, and thus arbitrage opportunities do not exist. Other factors related to timing, anticipation effects and outliers are more significant in determining whether liquidity providers initiate in those markets. The nature of the economies that these exchanges are designed to support is also a contributing factor to the dislocation and disintermediation of capital demand from local firms and truly large global organizations.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Steven E. Goune.en_US
dc.format.extent53 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent2970777 bytes
dc.format.extent2972896 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleThe challenge for liquidity in small stock exchanges and trading portals : the case of the Belgian Stock Exchangeen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc63190986en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record