Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHenry B. Weil.en_US
dc.contributor.authorTsuji, Yukari, M.B.A. Sloan School of Managementen_US
dc.contributor.otherSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-07-31T15:15:47Z
dc.date.available2006-07-31T15:15:47Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/33597
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractThe environment surrounding telecom companies has changed dramatically since most were privatized in the 1980s. Under the influence of regulations, they had faced globalization and have repeatedly divided and consolidated to improve competitiveness. From the technology and marketing points of view, two disruptive innovations occurred in the 1990s: IP and wireless communications. Originally, IP was used only for data communications, but it has now evolved to include voice communications as VolP. This had a huge impact on telecom companies because IP has destroyed the legacy cost structure that was based on a pay-as-you-go system; the new demand is for a flat rate fee structure. IP also moved forward the commoditization of communication network services. At the same time, demand for cellphone service grew exponentially, and the number of cellphone subscribers surpassed that of fixed phone in 2000 in Japan. As a result, competitive superiority is shifting from long- distance companies to local and wireless companies. In this thesis, I discuss the telecom industry's situation, and compare three major carriers: AT&T, BT and NTT.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) I describe the organizational structures of each company to determine where there are-or if there is a requirement to improve- smooth transitions from R&D to business as one way to enhance the telecom companies' competitiveness. My research found that their strategies regarding the acquisition of competence are totally different: AT&T did internal development; BT purchased necessary technologies from the market; NTT led joint development with manufacturers. From the comparison and analysis, I determined that the R&D structure should be changed from the legacy linear model to a circular model that produced fast clock speed. In addition, companies must have relationships with external companies and universities in order to purchase products or technologies quickly and efficiently. Managing NTT Group effectively is another key issue to be executed. If NTT can turn these changes into an opportunity, the company can transform itself into an IP communication services company that is able to use its huge technical resources to give themselves a marketing advantage.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Yukari Tsuji.en_US
dc.format.extent105 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent5208378 bytes
dc.format.extent5212731 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.titleThe challenge of smooth transition from R&D business for innovation in a telecom companyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc63791104en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record