Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAsuman E. Ozdaglar.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHuang, Xin, 1978-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-09-28T15:04:12Z
dc.date.available2006-09-28T15:04:12Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34113
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 79-82).en_US
dc.description.abstractToday's large scale networks such as the Internet emerge from the interconnection of privately owned networks and serve heterogeneous users with different service needs. The service providers of these networks are interested in maximizing their profit. Since the existing pricing scheme cannot satisfy their needs, the service providers are looking for new pricing mechanisms. However, designing a for-profit pricing scheme is not a trivial task. The network contains millions of users who have their own interests and they react differently to price. Given such variety, how should the service providers charge the network resources to maximize their profit? In the presence of profit maximizing price, how should we allocate resources among these heterogeneous users? Will the resulting system suffer from efficiency loss? In this thesis, we will study these fundamental questions of profit maximizing price. We make three main contributions: First, we develop a framework to study profit maximizing prices in a general congested network. We study the flow control and routing decisions of self-interested users in the present of profit maximizing price. We define an equilibrium of the user choices and the monopoly equilibrium (ME) as the equilibrium prices set by the service provider and the corresponding user equilibrium.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Second, we use the framework to analyze the networks containing different types of user utilities: elastic or inelastic. For a network containing inelastic user utilities, we show that the flow allocations at the ME and the social optimum are the same. For a network containing elastic user utilities, we explicitly characterize the ME and study its performance relative to the user equilibrium at 0 prices and the social optimum that would result from centrally maximizing the aggregate system utility. Third, we define Braess' Paradox for a network involving pricing and show that Braess' Paradox does not occur under monopoly prices.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Xin Huang.en_US
dc.format.extent82 p.en_US
dc.format.extent3261031 bytes
dc.format.extent3264383 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.titleEfficiency and braess' paradox under pricing in general networken_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.identifier.oclc67617487en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record