Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorEric S. Rebentisch.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Lawrence Ren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-07T12:46:24Z
dc.date.available2006-11-07T12:46:24Z
dc.date.copyright2004en_US
dc.date.issued2004en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34532
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Engineering Systems Division, Technology and Policy Program; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2004.en_US
dc.descriptionPage 145 blank.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 140-144).en_US
dc.description.abstract"Intellectual capital" has been heralded in business journals as an important component for successful business development in today's economy. Intellectual capital consists of knowledge-based assets -- including people, relationships, tools, and processes - that create value for a firm and its clients. Previous research has emphasized the financial measurement of intellectual capital, including the valuation of corporate intangible assets and the difference between a firm's market value and book value. Unfortunately, these financial measures are not very useful to practitioners, as they provide few insights about how to allocate resources, improve operations, or strategically plan for future needs. In this research, a new conceptual framework is developed for understanding the role of intellectual capital in new product development. The framework develops a dynamic model of the three forms of intellectual capital - human capital, structural capital, and relational capital -- and identifies mechanisms for knowledge transfer, organizational learning, and value creation. The framework is bolstered by data from case studies of seven product development projects at different U.S. aerospace firms.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Using the concept of intellectual capital as a "lens", the case studies are comparatively analyzed to identify critical knowledge-based resources and capabilities that are used in the development of complex products and services. The studies suggest that a balanced portfolio of intellectual capital can create unique capabilities that lead to competitive advantage and differentiated performance. The analysis culminates in a self-assessment tool that managers can use to measure and assess the health of their intellectual capital base. In addition to providing management tools, the research has implications for U.S. aerospace policy, as well as the funding of further research into the role of corporate knowledge in today's information economy.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Lawrence R. Siegel.en_US
dc.format.extent145 p.en_US
dc.format.extent13726252 bytes
dc.format.extent13732628 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectTechnology and Policy Program.en_US
dc.subjectAeronautics and Astronautics.en_US
dc.titleMeasuring and managing intellectual capital in the U.S. aerospace industryen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Engineering Systems Division
dc.contributor.departmentTechnology and Policy Program
dc.identifier.oclc70957813en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record