Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid H. Marks and A. Denny Ellerman.en_US
dc.contributor.authorPharino, Chanathipen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-10T17:23:56Z
dc.date.available2008-01-10T17:23:56Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34614en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34614
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis research demonstrates an overview of the performance of water quality trading programs currently implemented within the U.S. The role of trading in water quality management is identified through systematical comparisons of all possible aspects related to trading process, structure, and scale of existing water quality trading programs. The role of trading focuses on the output of achieving standard ambient water quality and on increasing the flexibility of water quality management to enhance effectiveness and accommodate economic growth. The trading encourages independent polluters to make pollution control decisions that best suit their own situations. The trading reduces overall operating costs and distributes equity on water pollution control abatements between point sources and nonpoint sources. The achievement of each program is mainly affected by various factors that include (a) the flexibility of trading rules and water pollution regulations, (b) the polluters' obligation and financial ability to meet regulatory requirements, and (c) the localized characteristics of water pollution problems and diversity of polluters in a watershed. Any water quality trading framework should promote the principle of simplicity, reliability and minimal costs.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) The recommended approaches for improving program implementation are to (a) shift towards a cap-and-trade system; (b) allow the execution of a multi-party permit; (c) establish a statewide trading policy; (d) set up a hybrid system (between tradable permit and tax/rebate system); and (e) test the practicality of a program on a smaller scale before actual implementation at a larger scale.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Chanathip Pharino.en_US
dc.format.extent236 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/34614en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleUnderstanding the role of trading in water quality management : based on U.S. experienceen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc71304297en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record