Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDonna H. Rhodes.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBrown, Kevin M., S.M. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-07T13:38:57Z
dc.date.available2006-11-07T13:38:57Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34628
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, System Design and Management Program, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 143-150).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe military is the midst of significant change, due to the DoD transformation guidance and movement to Network-Centric Warfare/Operations. Unfortunately, both the guidance given, roadmaps produced and the level of espoused support for the transformation have caused fundamental change to occur slowly and at increasing expense. The military material development process was designed around a platform-centric system and worked well, but now the information age is causing a move to network-centric systems. This fundamental shift is not aligned with the DoD development process and reform will require broad changes in both organization and policy. This paper reviews the NCW Transformation goal, the DoD transformation guidance and compares them to the Transformation Roadmaps of the Army, Navy and Air Force. These guidance documents are then compared with actual transformation changes and the associated factors effecting the change, using J. Forrester type system dynamics models. The systems dynamics analysis studies numerous transformation factors for their effects and yields recommended alternative development architecture.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) The goal of the paper is to align the DoD development process with the transformation guidance goals to result in a process which speeds prototype testing, development and fielding of new military systems, while integrating state-of-the-art business practice and theory. This resulted in the creation of several models which describe the various acquisition systems and a new model which addresses the issues found in the other models. The new model represents a reconfigured architecture for the DoD acquisitions system and a new organization to implement the transformation.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Kevin M. Brown.en_US
dc.format.extent150 p.en_US
dc.format.extent9807385 bytes
dc.format.extent9815676 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.titleRe-Architecting the DoD acquisition process : a transition to the information ageen_US
dc.title.alternativeRe-Architecting the Department of Defense acquisition process : a transition to the information ageen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentSystem Design and Management Program.en_US
dc.identifier.oclc71442155en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record