Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorStephen Graves and Daniel Whitney.en_US
dc.contributor.authorConnally, Jason Walkeren_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2006-11-08T16:46:24Z
dc.date.available2006-11-08T16:46:24Z
dc.date.copyright2005en_US
dc.date.issued2005en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/34834
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering; in conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT, 2005.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 85-86).en_US
dc.description.abstractSemiconductor manufacturing is a highly complex and re-entrant process. In a fabrication facility, hundreds of decisions are made during a production shift regarding how shared tool capacity will be prioritized. These decisions contribute to how balanced or unbalanced the manufacturing line will be. Characteristics of an unbalanced line are large WIP bubbles, long queue times, and expediting. A balanced line has less WIP bubbles, shorter queues, and WIP is positioned at all points throughout the line to be in position to meet the demand forecasted. This thesis focuses on work performed at Intel's Fab 23 to improve the process for assigning production priorities through the introduction of pull methodologies. Existing processes and tools were studied, and an improved methodology and decision-support tool was developed to aid operations managers in driving towards a balanced line. An experiment was also designed and executed in production to test the methods and tools developed. Target cycle time data was used along with throughput goals to construct a target inventory profile throughout the line. Actual inventory was then compared to the ideal "balanced" profile to determine where WIP deficits and surpluses existed.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Using this information, the operations managers had objective metrics that could be used in determining which operations should receive priority. Significant externalities inhibited performance during the experiment, preventing measurable improvements in line balance and cycle time from being realized. However, these externalities were known prior to experimentation, and a decision was made to learn from the experiment.The tool proved helpful in promoting consistency across shifts in how the factory was run. There were many anecdotal examples of the decision-support tool driving more intelligent priority decisions than operations managers would have made without the tool.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jason Walker Connally.en_US
dc.format.extent86 p.en_US
dc.format.extent6486909 bytes
dc.format.extent6490455 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.titleIntroducing pull methodologies in a semiconductor faben_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Manufacturing Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc63183266en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record