Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHenry C. Chueh.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChang, Jaimeen_US
dc.contributor.otherHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-01-10T16:37:16Z
dc.date.available2007-01-10T16:37:16Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/35551
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Harvard-MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractA well-designed implementation of medication concepts, records, and lists in an electronic medical record (EMR) system allows it to successfully perform many functions vital for the provision of quality health care. A controlled medication terminology provides the foundation for decision support services, such as duplication checking, allergy checking, and drug-drug interaction alerts. Clever modeling of medication records makes it easy to provide a history of any medication the patient is on and to generate the patient's medication list for any arbitrary point in time. Medication lists that distinguish between description and prescription and that are exportable in a standard format can play an essential role in medication reconciliation and contribute to the reduction of medication errors. At present, there is no general agreement on how to best implement medication concepts, records, and lists. The underlying implementation in an EMR often reflects the needs, culture, and history of both the developers and the local users. survey of a sample of medication terminologies (COSTAR Directory, the MDD, NDDF Plus, and RxNorm) and EMR implementations of medication records (OnCall, LMR, and the Benedum EMR) reveals the advantages and disadvantages of each. There is no medication system that would fit perfectly in every single context, but some features should strongly be considered in the development of any new system.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) A survey of a sample of medication terminologies (COSTAR Directory, the MDD, NDDF Plus, and RxNorm) and EMR implementations of medication records (OnCall, LMR, and the Benedum EMR) reveals the advantages and disadvantages of each. There is no medication system that would fit perfectly in every single context, but some features should strongly be considered in the development of any new system.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jaime Chang.en_US
dc.format.extent41 leavesen_US
dc.format.extent2656529 bytes
dc.format.extent2656345 bytes
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.format.mimetypeapplication/pdf
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology.en_US
dc.titleMedication concepts, records, and lists in electronic medical record systemsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentHarvard University--MIT Division of Health Sciences and Technology
dc.identifier.oclc73726791en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record