Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorQingyan (Yan) Chen.en_US
dc.contributor.authorOlsen, Erik L. (Erik Lee), 1979-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture.en_US
dc.coverage.spatiale-uk---en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-04-20T15:46:27Z
dc.date.available2007-04-20T15:46:27Z
dc.date.copyright2002en_US
dc.date.issued2002en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37195
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Architecture, 2002.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 115-119).en_US
dc.description.abstractBuilding energy simulation is an important tool for evaluating the energy consumption of a building and can provide guidance in the design of a building and its mechanical systems. EnergyPlus is a new energy simulation program meant to be a major advance over existing energy simulation programs. This study uses EnergyPlus to compare several alternative low-energy cooling systems for an office building in suburban London and compare them to the chilled ceiling system installed in the actual building. Prior to modeling the full -scale building, several validation studies demonstrate the accuracy of EnergyPlus and the author's competency as an EnergyPlus user. Systems considered include displacement ventilation, traditional mixing variable air volume ventilation, night cooling, and natural ventilation. Several changes were made to the EnergyPlus source code to model these systems appropriately. Most notable are a displacement ventilation three-node vertical temperature gradient model and a simple model for prediction of the natural ventilation rate. A detailed building model is created from inputs gathered from both building design documents and measured data. An excellent comparison between simulated and measured space temperatures over a one-month period demonstrates the accuracy of the model. System comparisons show that systems using free cooling from outside air and night cooling use the least energy and have the smallest equipment. Natural ventilation alone is insufficient to maintain summer comfort within the building, but could be used within a hybrid ventilation system. Conclusions are that EnergyPlus should be adopted for general use, because it represents a major improvement over previous energy simulation programs and is capable of modeling real-world buildings. A hybrid ventilation system would have the lowest building system energy use, but displacement ventilation is also a good choice, and could be implemented with few changes to the existing building.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Erik L. Olsen.en_US
dc.format.extent129 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.relation.requiresMicrosoft Excel.en_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectArchitecture.en_US
dc.titlePerformance comparison of U.K. low-energy cooling systems by energy simulationen_US
dc.title.alternativePerformance comparison of United Kingdom low-energy cooling systems by energy simulationen_US
dc.title.alternativePerformance comparison of United Kingdom low-energy cooling systems by energy simulationen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Architecture
dc.identifier.oclc50776548en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record