Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJonathan Gruber.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSiegel, Sarah Yen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-05-16T18:32:18Z
dc.date.available2007-05-16T18:32:18Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37406
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references.en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis consists of three separate papers. In the first paper, using the Panel Study of Income Dynamics (PSID), which has measures of both risk preferences and religiosity along with measures of many risky behaviors, I investigate the implications of the correlations among risk preferences, religiosity and gender for the observed relationship of each of these variables with risky behaviors. I conclude that the correlations of risk preferences, religiosity, and gender with behaviors are all strongly robust to including the others in the regression; although they are correlated, they have independent relationships with risky behaviors. The second paper reports the results of a randomized field experiment to study the impact of choice in charitable giving; in this experiment half of the recipients of a newsletter from a Dutch NGO were able to choose what program area their donation would be spent on. There is no difference in either mean response rates or mean donation amounts between the treatment and control groups; I thus conclude that while most of the treatment group in this experiment did not value the choice that they were given, the choice also did not make them any less likely to donate.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) In the third paper, a coauthor and I develop a computer model in which individual agents choose a neighborhood based on preferences over the area's racial composition; this model of residential segregation is loosely based on the 1971 Schelling model. We find that both the strength of preferences for diversity, and historical segregation, have strong effects on equilibrium levels of integration. When we include contemporary discrimination in our model, however, we find that it increases segregation in an initially unsegregated model, but has no additional effect on segregation in an initially segregated model. Finally, we examine a simple social policy that encourages integration, and find that it is successful in creating diversity, making diversity-seeking agents better off.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Sarah Y. Siegel.en_US
dc.format.extent107 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectEconomics.en_US
dc.titleThree essays in public economicsen_US
dc.title.alternative3 essays in public economicsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economics
dc.identifier.oclc123025483en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record