Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorPiotr Indyk.en_US
dc.contributor.authorBădoiu, Mihai, 1978-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-18T13:06:12Z
dc.date.available2007-07-18T13:06:12Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37898
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 233-242).en_US
dc.description.abstractWe present several computationally efficient algorithms, and complexity results on low distortion mappings between metric spaces. An embedding between two metric spaces is a mapping between the two metric spaces and the distortion of the embedding is the factor by which the distances change. We have pioneered theoretical work on relative (or approximation) version of this problem. In this setting, the question is the following: for the class of metrics C, and a host metric M', what is the smallest approximation factor a > 1 of an efficient algorithm minimizing the distortion of an embedding of a given input metric M E C into M'? This formulation enables the algorithm to adapt to a given input metric. In particular, if the host metric is "expressive enough" to accurately model the input distances, the minimum achievable distortion is low, and the algorithm will produce an embedding with low distortion as well. This problem has been a subject of extensive applied research during the last few decades. However, almost all known algorithms for this problem are heuristic. As such, they can get stuck in local minima, and do not provide any global guarantees on solution quality. We investigate several variants of the above problem, varying different host and target metrics, and definitions of distortion.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) We present results for different types of distortion: multiplicative versus additive, worst-case versus average-case and several types of target metrics, such as the line, the plane, d-dimensional Euclidean space, ultrametrics, and trees. We also present algorithms for ordinal embeddings and embedding with extra information.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Mihai Bădoiu.en_US
dc.format.extent242 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.titleAlgorithmic embeddingsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.identifier.oclc132692782en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record