Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorJanice A. Klein and David H. Staelin.en_US
dc.contributor.authorNeal, Thomas E. (Thomas Eugene)en_US
dc.contributor.otherLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-07-18T13:13:10Z
dc.date.available2007-07-18T13:13:10Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/37939
dc.descriptionThesis (M.B.A.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management; and, (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science; in conjunction with the Leaders for Manufacturing Program at MIT, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 86).en_US
dc.description.abstractClassical manufacturing work cells have machines to perform each operation in the process, the number of each type of machine being chosen so that all machines would be equally busy. Although design of work cells for producing one product is straightforward, the design of a multi-product work cell is much more complex. Each product might require different machinery or require different processing times per operation, which complicates leveling the workload between machines. The decision of what type of machinery to purchase for a particular operation can be complex in itself when comparing a number of technologically different alternatives. Although the machines' operating characteristics might be well known, it is often difficult to understand how each technology will affect the overall production system. Any new work cell implementation is bound to cause friction within the organization. Change must be properly managed if it is to be done correctly. To implement any new structure for a work cell, both management and hourly employees must learn a new way of doing things. Often these new methods encounter significant resistance if not implemented in a way that takes into account their cultural impact.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) This thesis describes a method for designing multi-product manufacturing work cells that utilizes optimization techniques to select capital machinery and uses Lean principles to assemble the machinery into an efficient and effective unit. It also shows how the best machinery for an operating environment can be chosen from two competing technologies. Finally, the thesis describes methodology for implementing new work cells in a change-adverse culture. Although this thesis applies to the manufacture of almost any product, its example involves a factory manufacturing turbine airfoils and, more specifically, the design of work cells for drilling holes in turbine airfoils.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Thomas E. Neal, Jr.en_US
dc.format.extent86 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectSloan School of Management.en_US
dc.subjectElectrical Engineering and Computer Science.en_US
dc.subjectLeaders for Manufacturing Program.en_US
dc.titleUsing optimization and lean principles to design work cells and make capital purchase decisions for hole drilling operations in turbine airfoil manufacturingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.description.degreeM.B.A.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentLeaders for Manufacturing Program at MITen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc144555003en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record