Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorAnuradha M. Annaswamy.en_US
dc.contributor.authorChoi, Jae Jeen, 1975-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Mechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-03T18:22:16Z
dc.date.available2007-08-03T18:22:16Z
dc.date.copyright2006en_US
dc.date.issued2006en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38260
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Mechanical Engineering, 2006.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 104-110).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn recent years, it has been demonstrated that direct microjet injection into the shear layer of the main jet disrupts the feedback loop inherent in high speed impinging jet flows, thereby significantly reduces the adverse effects. The amount of noise reduced by microjet actuation is known to be dependent on nozzle operating conditions. In this paper, two active control strategies using microjets are suggested to maintain a uniform, reliable, and optimal reduction of these tones over the entire range of operating conditions. In the first method, a quasi-closed loop control strategy is proposed using steady microjet injection and the Proper Orthogonal Decomposition (POD) algorithm. The most energetic spatial mode of the unsteady pressure along the nozzle diameter is captured using the POD, which in turn is used to determine the distribution of microjet intensity along the nozzle exit. Preliminary experimental results from a STOVL supersonic jet facility at Mach 1.5 show that the quasi-closed loop control strategy, in some cases, provides an additional 8,10 dB reduction compared to axisymmetric injection at the desired operating conditions. The second method consists of a pulsed microjet injection, motivated by the need to further improve the noise suppression.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) It was observed that the pulsed microjet was able to bring about the same noise reduction as steady injection using approximately 40% of the corresponding mass flow rate of the steady microjet case. Moreover, as the duty cycle increased, the performance of pulsed injection was further enhanced and was observed to completely eliminate the impinging tones at all operating conditions. In order to obtain an optimal performance of the actuator, a new model of the impinging jet flow field is suggested based on a collision model of two identical vortices. In addition to the colliding vortex model, a two-mode feedback model that captures both the low and high-frequency Rossiter mode was suggested to investigate the role of pulsed microjet in the feedback loop. Due to the fact that a low frequency pulsing (16.4 Hz) brought about additional reduction compared to high frequency pulsing, the presence of low frequency mode is identified. In the context of the analytic model, the effect of pulsing is modeled using a input-shaping controller that accomplishes noise-reduction through a suitable redistribution of the acoustic excitation over the high and low frequencies.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jae Jeen Choi.en_US
dc.format.extent110 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectMechanical Engineering.en_US
dc.titleActive noise control in supersonic impinging jets using pulsed microjets : actuator design, reduced-order modelingen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Mechanical Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc151000317en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record