Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorRudiger Dornbusch and Daron Acemoglu.en_US
dc.contributor.authorWolfson, Alexander E. (Alexander Edward), 1973-en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Economics.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-08-03T18:43:12Z
dc.date.available2007-08-03T18:43:12Z
dc.date.copyright1999en_US
dc.date.issued1999en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38436
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph.D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Economics, c1999.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 101-104).en_US
dc.description.abstractThis thesis considers the structure of international production and trade. Chapter 2 uses direct information on factor input requirements to consider which elements best explain the patterns of actual technologies. If there is factor price equalization, all countries will share the same capital-labor ratios, regardless of endowments. I find that actual technologies are inconsistent with this view. Estimates of country productivities which ignore the patterns of factor substitution are incorrect. Once allowances are made for differences in capitallabor endowments, 90% of the variation in output per worker can be explained by country-specific and industry-specific parameters. I also find that factor-augmenting productivities are negatively related to factor endowments. In Chapter 3, I consider the implications of these technological differences for measures of the factor content of trade. Typically, the factor content of trade is measured by applying one country's technology matrix to the output of all countries. Contrary to theory, this approach finds no relationship between factor endowments and the factor content of trade. Since countries use techniques which are biased towards their abundant factor, the factor content of trade flows in the correct direction when measured using actual technologies. However, the mystery of the missing trade remains: even when factor contents are measured correctly, they are a very small percentage of factor endowments. In Chapter 4, I use disaggregated price data from Canada and the United States to consider the propostion that the price of goods is equalized across countries. Using time-series cointegration methods, I find evidence in favour of the law of one price for some, mostly homogeneous traded goods. However, most goods, both traded and nontraded, provide little support for the law of one price. Moreover, deviations from the law of one price can persist for many years.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Alexander E. Wolfson.en_US
dc.format.extent104 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectEconomics.en_US
dc.titleTechnology, trade, and pricesen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Economicsen_US
dc.identifier.oclc43840861en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record