Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorFranz-Josef Ulm.en_US
dc.contributor.authorDavila, Ricardo Sen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-09-28T13:14:51Z
dc.date.available2007-09-28T13:14:51Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/38939
dc.descriptionThesis (M. Eng.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (leaves 124-125).en_US
dc.description.abstractNew materials frequently require modifications or rewrites of existing construction codes. They may also need new methods for their manufacture and installation. DUCTAL, a new ultra-high performance concrete (UHPC) with enhanced tensile, compressive, and deflective behavior offered by LaFarge, is one such material, and current guidelines for concrete do not sufficiently account for these improved properties. Research by other universities and professional institutions has produced sequential recommendations, beginning with the experiment-based set from the Association Francaise de Genie Civil (AFGC) through the analytically-based set from MIT. In this thesis, the MIT approach is further developed into a coherent method for hardened UHPC design. The first two sections familiarize the reader with the analytical model for UHPC and the evolution in design codes and their philosophical bases. Essential concepts, such as the two-phase matrix-fiber behavior of the material and the use of a maximum crack width criterion to govern design, are explained. Next, the most current design guidelines are presented in full, with attention paid to bending and shear resistance. Comparisons with previous codes demonstrate the ability of these guidelines to produce more structurally efficient sections which consume less material.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Analysis of the recommendations themselves will demonstrate the existence of a size effect and the cross-sectional parameters that affect structural efficiency most. Optimization based on the one-dimensional analytical model closes with an analysis of different cross-sections for their structural efficiency, span-to-height ratios, required prestressing, and amount of material consumed. The one-dimensional model is then extended to three-dimensions, providing the framework and relations needed to perform non-linear finite element analysis. Practical consequences of the differences between the 1-D and 3-D models allows for the proposed MIT guidelines to be validated and their safety ensured. A dynamic analysis of a box section optimized according to the proposed guidelines is then performed with the aid of the 3-D model, and the results demonstrate its safety. Overall, the reader shall be given an outline of how to design for hardened UHPC.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Ricardo S. Davila.en_US
dc.format.extent125 leavesen_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectCivil and Environmental Engineering.en_US
dc.titleRecommendations for the design of ultra-high performance concrete structuresen_US
dc.title.alternativeRecommendations for the design of UHPC structuresen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.Eng.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering
dc.identifier.oclc166268565en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record