Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDeborah Fitzgerald.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHiesinger, Margaret Amaliaen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2007-11-16T14:28:11Z
dc.date.available2007-11-16T14:28:11Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39578
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D. in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTS))--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Program in Science, Technology and Society, June 2007.en_US
dc.description"May 2007."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 284-308).en_US
dc.description.abstractMy research is about the particular effects of Vietnam's economic liberalization program (known as "doi moi") on the local food and market system in Hanoi. Doi moi policies, which began in the late 1980s, have instituted major changes in both the national system of agricultural production and in Hanoi's local system of marketplaces. The doi moi reforms have created many new opportunities in Hanoi, but they have also re-configured social relationships and market spaces along the food chain to present new kinds of risk for consumers. These include harmful chemicals, goods of uncertain quality, and sellers who operate outside of the moral obligations of the dominant system of personal relationships. These things have not yet been resolved through regulation and have therefore been left to consumers and sellers to work out among themselves. The competition between various actors to manage foodborne risk in the absence of state regulation has taken place amidst the state's campaign to re-order Hanoi's market system according to neoiberal ideals.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) This has made the local market system a site for the enactment of a symbolic politics of modernity in which discourses that are really about risk and political economy have been obscured by their expression as a debate about "tradition" and modernity." Beneath the discourse of modernization lies a range of hybrid market worlds as well as systemic issues related to the transition from a centrally planned economy to a free market system.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Margaret A. Hiesingeren_US
dc.format.extent308 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectProgram in Science, Technology and Society.en_US
dc.titleThose who don't know : modernity, risk, and transition in Hanoi's local marketsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.in History, Anthropology, and Science, Technology and Society (HASTSen_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Program in Science, Technology and Society
dc.identifier.oclc174289708en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record