Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLorlene Hoyt.en_US
dc.contributor.authorStelson, Aaron (Aaron Barzelay)en_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-01-10T16:04:51Z
dc.date.available2008-01-10T16:04:51Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/39940
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. [113]-118).en_US
dc.description.abstractSpatial assimilation theory presents a dilemma for community-based organizations (CBOs) in ethnic enclaves, especially those CBOs that assist enclavers--residents of ethnic enclaves-in building assets such as increased earnings or English fluency. The theory suggests that as immigrants build assets they are more likely to leave ethnic enclaves in search of more amenity-rich neighborhoods. Thus, the very people that could be leaders in community revitalization are also the most apt to leave, interrupting the potential positive benefits they could have on the community by, for example, spending money in community, creating businesses that employ community members, or serving on the local Parent-Teacher Association. To better understand residential mobility in ethnic enclaves in Lawrence, Massachusetts, this thesis analyzes results of a survey of Lawrence enclavers to identify which factors were important to enclavers in choosing a home both when they first moved to Lawrence and now. Further, this thesis identifies factors that Lawrence meets particularly well and factors that leave room for improvement across several points in time.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) Contrary to spatial assimilation theory, the findings of this thesis suggest that as enclavers build assets they are actually more likely to plan to stay in Lawrence because they are able to improve their living conditions within the enclave and still maintain wanted social and cultural connections. This implies that the dilemma Lawrence CBOs face may be less problematic than originally thought. However, this thesis also discovered that there were enclavers that built assets and planned to leave Lawrence. Most likely their mobility decisions stem from dissatisfaction with public schools and neighborhood safety. This thesis recommends that Lawrence CBOs pursue initiatives that seek to improve schools and neighborhood safety while expanding the reach of community-based organizations and empowering enclavers.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Aaron Stelson.en_US
dc.format.extent150 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleShould I stay or should i go? : residential mobility in ethnic enclaves in Lawrence, Massachusettsen_US
dc.title.alternativeResidential mobility in ethnic enclaves in Lawrence, Massachusettsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc182845108en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record