Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorLangley Keyes.en_US
dc.contributor.authorHarris, Jonathan R., M.C.P. Massachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.coverage.spatialn-us-ilen_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-04T20:48:29Z
dc.date.available2008-02-04T20:48:29Z
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40121
dc.descriptionThesis (M.C.P. and S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Urban Studies and Planning, 2007.en_US
dc.description"June 2007."en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 105-108).en_US
dc.description.abstractThe significant rise in the prison population in the United States has resulted in a severe shock to the correctional system. Specifically, from 1980 to 2004, the population of offenders incarcerated in state and federal prisons has increased almost five-fold from 315,974 to 1,494,216. As a result, 650,000 prisoners are released back into society each year, placing additional stress on already distressed communities. The ability of released prisoners, or ex-offenders, to successfully reintegrate into society depends to a large degree on the programming made available to them prior to and after their release. However, the cadre of programming offered by prison systems is constrained by the frames that policymakers use to talk about the issue of prisoner reentry. Understanding the frames that people construct are the key to grasping the philosophical foundations underlying current legislation as well as to proffering new policy solutions that are relevant to all stakeholders. This thesis documents both the historical and current frames surrounding the issue of prisoner reentry in Illinois corrections policy, particularly as it relates to the city of Chicago, which takes in 20,000 ex-offenders each year from the Illinois prison system.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) The dominant policy discourse in Illinois is moving away from the crime control frame, which emphasizes punishment and incapacitation of offenders, to what I call the public safety frame, which paints rehabilitation as a mechanism for reducing crime. This re framing has allowed advocates of ex-offenders to gain support for reentry initiatives from Illinois legislators and criminal justice professionals. Yet, with the value of reentry initiatives being tied to crime reduction, advocates of rehabilitation will be under pressure to produce results in the performance-driven environment of the Illinois criminal justice system. The political tenability of rehabilitation as a policy response may very well depend on its ability to align with other frames present in the Illinois discourse.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Jonathan R. Harris.en_US
dc.format.extent108 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectUrban Studies and Planning.en_US
dc.titleOut of the cell : exploring the framing of prisoner reentry in Illinois corrections policyen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeM.C.P.and S.B.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Department of Urban Studies and Planning
dc.identifier.oclc187303527en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record