Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorDavid Simchi-Levi.en_US
dc.contributor.authorShum, Wanhangen_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Operations Research Center.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-02-27T22:18:27Z
dc.date.available2008-02-27T22:18:27Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/40385
dc.descriptionThesis (Ph. D.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Sloan School of Management, Operations Research Center, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 115-121).en_US
dc.description.abstractIn the past decade, we have seen significant increase in the level of outsourcing in many industries. This increase in the level of outsourcing increases the importance of implementing effective contracts in supply chains. In this thesis, we study several issues in supply chain contracts. In the first part of the thesis, we study the impact of effort in a supply chain with multiple retailers. The costly effort engaged by a retailer may increase or decrease the demands of other retailers. However, effort is usually not verifiable and hence not contractible. Based on the impact of a retailer's effort on its own and other retailers' revenue, we classify each retailer into different categories. According to the corresponding categories of all retailers, we identify coordinating contracts and general classes of contracts that cannot coordinate. Second, we study the stability of coordinating contracts in supply chains. We illustrate that, due to competition, not all coordinating contracts are achievable. Thus, we introduce the notion of rational contracts, which reflects the agents "bargaining power". We propose a general framework for coordinating and rational contracts. Using this framework, we analyze two supply chains, a supply chain with multiple suppliers and single retailer, and a supply chain with a single supplier and price-competing retailers.en_US
dc.description.abstract(cont.) We identify coordinating contracts for each case and characterize the bounds on profit shares for the agents in any rational contracts. Finally, we study the robustness of coordinating contracts to renegotiation. Applying the concept of contract equilibrium, we show that many coordinating contracts are not robust to bilateral renegotiation if the relationship between the supplier and the retailers is a one-shot game. If the supplier and retailers engage in long-term relationship, then many coordinating contracts are robust to bilateral renegotiation. We also extend concept of contract equilibrium to the concept of strong contract equilibrium to study the robustness of contracts to multilateral renegotiation. We show that, in repeated game setting, the concept of strong contract equilibrium is related to the concept of rational contracts.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Wanhang (Stephen) Shum.en_US
dc.format.extent121 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582
dc.subjectOperations Research Center.en_US
dc.titleEffective contracts in supply chainsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreePh.D.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Operations Research Center
dc.contributor.departmentSloan School of Management
dc.identifier.oclc191109477en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record