Show simple item record

dc.contributor.advisorHenry Lieberman.en_US
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Dustin Arthuren_US
dc.contributor.otherMassachusetts Institute of Technology. Dept. of Architecture. Program in Media Arts and Sciences.en_US
dc.date.accessioned2008-05-19T16:14:16Z
dc.date.available2008-05-19T16:14:16Z
dc.date.copyright2007en_US
dc.date.issued2007en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/41748
dc.descriptionThesis (S.M.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, School of Architecture and Planning, Program in Media Arts and Sciences, 2007.en_US
dc.descriptionIncludes bibliographical references (p. 81-85).en_US
dc.description.abstractCalendar applications do not understand calendar entries. This limitation prevents them from offering the range of assistance that can be provided by a human personal assistant. Understanding calendar entries is a difficult problem because it involves integrating many types of knowledge: commonsense knowledge, about common events and the particular instances in the world, and user knowledge about the individual's preferences and goals. In this thesis, I present two models of event understanding: RoMULUS and JULIUS. ROMULUS addresses the problem of how missing information in a calendar entry can be filled in by having an event structure, goal knowledge, and past examples. This system is able to learn by observing the user, and constrains its inductive hypothesis by using knowledge about common goals specific to the event. Although this model is capable of representing some tasks, its structural assumptions limit the range of events that it can represent. JULIUS treats event understanding as a plan retrieval problem, and draws from the COMET plan library of 295 everyday plans to interpret the calendar entry. These plans are represented as a set of English activity phrases (i.e., "buy a cup of coffee"), and so the planning problem becomes a natural language understanding problem concerned with comprehending events. I show two techniques for retrieving plans: the first matches plans by their generalized predicate-argument structure, and the second retrieves plans by their goals. Goals are inferred by matching the plans against a database of 662 common goals, by computing the conceptual similarity between the goals and components of the plan. Combining the strengths of ROMULUS and JULIUS, I create a prototype of a personal assistant application, EVENTMINDER, that is able to recognize users' goals in order to propose relevant alternatives and provide useful recommendations.en_US
dc.description.statementofresponsibilityby Dustin Arthur Smith.en_US
dc.format.extent85 p.en_US
dc.language.isoengen_US
dc.publisherMassachusetts Institute of Technologyen_US
dc.rightsM.I.T. theses are protected by copyright. They may be viewed from this source for any purpose, but reproduction or distribution in any format is prohibited without written permission. See provided URL for inquiries about permission.en_US
dc.rights.urihttp://dspace.mit.edu/handle/1721.1/7582en_US
dc.subjectArchitecture. Program in Media Arts and Sciences.en_US
dc.titleEventMinder : a personal calendar assistant that understands eventsen_US
dc.title.alternativePersonal calendar assistant that understands eventsen_US
dc.typeThesisen_US
dc.description.degreeS.M.en_US
dc.contributor.departmentProgram in Media Arts and Sciences (Massachusetts Institute of Technology)
dc.identifier.oclc225885731en_US


Files in this item

Thumbnail

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record